Nanomaterials

Methods for making nanomaterials are divided into top-down methods, which break larger materials into smaller pieces, and bottom-up methods, which assemble atoms and molecules. Which is a bottom-up method?

  1. AGrinding a powder in a ball mill for many hours so that repeated collisions break it down into nanosized particles
  2. BEtching a thin film along a pattern drawn by photolithography to carve it into nanoscale features
  3. CReducing metal salts or decomposing precursors in solution so that nanoparticles form by nucleation and growth
Show answer and explanation

Answer: C. Reducing metal salts or decomposing precursors in solution so that nanoparticles form by nucleation and growth

Reduction or thermal decomposition in solution (chemical liquid-phase synthesis) is a bottom-up method in which atoms and molecules gather to form nuclei that grow into particles. The sol-gel method, condensation from the vapor phase and CVD growth of carbon nanotubes are also bottom-up methods. Ball milling is a top-down method that mechanically crushes large particles into smaller ones; the equipment is simple and suited to mass production, but the size distribution tends to be broad, and contamination from the milling media and introduction of strain occur. Lithography and etching are also top-down methods, removing unwanted parts from a larger film, with the advantage of precise control over shape and position. Bottom-up methods make it easy to control size and shape at the atomic level but face challenges in mass production and positional control.

Report an error

Practice this topic Back to topic

More Nanomaterials questions

  1. Why does the hot-injection method (rapidly injecting precursors into a hot solvent) readily give nanoparticles of uniform size (monodisperse)?
  2. Which is an appropriate way to keep oxide nanoparticles dispersed in water from agglomerating and settling?
  3. Which correctly describes the principle of the BET method for measuring the specific surface area of a powder?
  4. For an alumina nanopowder, the primary particle diameter observed by TEM was about 30 nm, and the particle size obtained from the BET specific surface area assuming spheres was also about 30 nm. However, the mean particle size measured by dynamic light scattering after dispersing it in water was about 400 nm. Which interpretation of these results is most appropriate?
  5. Spherical TiO₂ nanoparticles 20 nm in diameter (density 4.0 g/cm³) are all the same size and fully dispersed. Which value is closest to the surface area per gram of powder (the specific surface area)?