Electronic, magnetic and optical materials

Light is shone on a 1.0 µm thick film of a material with an absorption coefficient of 1.0×10⁴ cm⁻¹. Which value is closest to the fraction of light transmitted through the film? Neglect surface reflection and take I = I₀exp(−αx).

  1. AAbout 37%
  2. BAbout 10%
  3. CAbout 63%
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. About 37%

Converting the thickness to cm gives x = 1.0 µm = 1.0×10⁻⁴ cm, so αx = 1.0×10⁴ × 1.0×10⁻⁴ = 1.0. The transmitted fraction is exp(−1.0) ≈ 0.37, about 37%. About 10% calculates with a power of ten (10⁻¹) instead of exp, confusing this with absorbance defined by the common logarithm. About 63% is 1 − exp(−1), the fraction absorbed in the film. 1/α is the penetration depth at which the light intensity falls to 1/e, here 1 µm. Direct-gap semiconductors have large α of 10⁴–10⁵ cm⁻¹ for light with energy above the band gap, so even thin films absorb light sufficiently.

Report an error

Practice this topic Back to topic

More Electronic, magnetic and optical materials questions

  1. What is the main reason silicon is hardly ever used as the emitting material in light-emitting diodes?
  2. Which value is closest to the resistivity of n-type silicon with a donor concentration of 1.0×10¹⁶ cm⁻³ (room temperature, all donors ionized)? Take the electron mobility as 1350 cm²/(V·s) and the elementary charge as 1.60×10⁻¹⁹ C, and neglect the hole contribution.
  3. Which correctly describes how electrical resistivity changes when the temperature is raised? Assume the semiconductor is in the intrinsic regime.
  4. The resistivity of pure copper due to lattice vibrations is 1.70 µΩ·cm at 300 K and 0.20 µΩ·cm at 77 K. For a copper alloy in which added impurities give a temperature-independent residual resistivity of 0.40 µΩ·cm, which value is closest to the resistivity ratio ρ(300 K)/ρ(77 K) according to Matthiessen's rule?
  5. Magnesium has two valence electrons, and the band formed from 3s orbitals is exactly filled by two electrons per atom. Which correctly explains why magnesium is nevertheless a metal?