Strengthening mechanisms and dislocations
The yield stress σy of an FCC polycrystal is about three times the critical resolved shear stress τc of a single crystal (σy ≈ Mτc, M ≈ 3.06). Which is the correct reason why this factor M (the Taylor factor) is larger than 2, the reciprocal of the maximum Schmid factor of 0.5?
- AIn a polycrystal only the most favorably oriented grains slip first while the others stay elastic, so M becomes larger to make up for the lower average strength
- BFor neighboring grains to deform without opening gaps or overlapping at the grain boundaries, at least five independent slip systems must operate in each grain, including poorly oriented ones
- CA polycrystal has far more grain-boundary area than a single crystal, and the grain-boundary energy adds to the work of deformation, so M is about 3 regardless of grain size
Show answer and explanation
Answer: B. For neighboring grains to deform without opening gaps or overlapping at the grain boundaries, at least five independent slip systems must operate in each grain, including poorly oriented ones
In a polycrystal, if each grain deformed into any shape it liked, gaps and overlaps would open at the grain boundaries. To accommodate an arbitrary change of shape at constant volume, five independent slip systems are needed (the von Mises criterion). As a result, poorly oriented systems must operate along with those of high Schmid factor, and averaging over a randomly oriented FCC polycrystal gives a Taylor factor of about 3.06. If yielding were set only by the most favorably oriented grains, a factor larger than 2 could not be explained. The Taylor factor is set by the distribution of grain orientations and does not depend on grain-boundary area or grain size; the effect of grain size is added separately through the Hall–Petch relationship. The same criterion explains why polycrystals of HCP metals, which lack enough independent slip systems, have poor ductility.
Continue: 9 more Strengthening mechanisms and dislocations questions