Strengthening mechanisms and dislocations

When a metal is plastically deformed in tension, unloaded and then compressed in the reverse direction, the yield stress in compression is lower than the flow stress it would have had if tension had continued. Which is the correct explanation of this phenomenon (the Bauschinger effect)?

  1. ADislocations piled up against obstacles during tension leave an internal stress in the opposite direction (back stress), which assists deformation in the reverse direction
  2. BVacancies created during tension gather into voids after unloading, and in compression the voids collapse, lowering the apparent yield stress
  3. CPlastic deformation in tension elongates the grains along the tensile direction and makes them finer, so that only the compressive yield stress falls through the Hall–Petch relationship
Show answer and explanation

Answer: A. Dislocations piled up against obstacles during tension leave an internal stress in the opposite direction (back stress), which assists deformation in the reverse direction

During tension, dislocations pile up against grain boundaries, precipitates and clusters of other dislocations, and Orowan loops remain around hard particles. These create an internal stress (back stress) that opposes the tensile deformation and assists deformation in the reverse direction. So when the loading is reversed, the back stress acts to push the dislocations back, and compression begins at a lower stress. Gathering or collapse of vacancies cannot explain it. Grain refinement, through the Hall–Petch relationship, raises both the tensile and the compressive yield stress, so it cannot be why only the compressive one falls. The Bauschinger effect must be taken into account in analyzing members under cyclic loading, in reverse bending of sheet and in assessing the strength of formed steel pipe.

Report an error

Practice this topic Back to topic

More Strengthening mechanisms and dislocations questions

  1. As precipitates grow during aging, the strength rises to a maximum and then falls (overaging). Which is the correct explanation in terms of the interaction between precipitates and dislocations? Take the volume fraction of precipitates as constant.
  2. In an aluminum alloy, the increase in shear stress due to the Orowan mechanism, in which dislocations bow out and pass between precipitates, is estimated as Δτ ≈ Gb/L (L is the precipitate spacing). With G = 26 GPa, b = 0.286 nm and L = 100 nm, and taking the increase in the yield stress of the polycrystal as Δσ = MΔτ (Taylor factor M = 3.06), which is closest to Δσ?
  3. Which statement about the characteristics of dislocations shearing through precipitates with an ordered structure, such as the γ' phase (an L1₂ ordered phase) in Ni-based superalloys, is correct?
  4. Which statement about dispersion strengthening with oxide particles, as in copper containing fine Al₂O₃ particles or ODS steels with Y₂O₃ particles dispersed in iron, is correct?
  5. The yield stress of an alloy is estimated from contributions of 50 MPa friction stress, 60 MPa solid-solution strengthening, 200 MPa precipitation strengthening and 100 MPa dislocation strengthening. If the friction stress and solid-solution strengthening are simply added, while the contributions of precipitates and dislocations, which are obstacles of similar strength, are combined as the square root of the sum of squares (σ = σ₀ + σss + √(σp² + σd²)), which is closest to the yield stress?